Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

["Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>]

Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Sergey Spiridonov <sena@hurd.homeunix.org> [030813 13:36]:
>
> > It's interesting that people who want Debian to move FDL to non-free at 
> > the same time want Debian to distribute non-free stuff.
> >
> > Is it accidental?
>
> I think that is at most half true. The other direction is definitly true:

What is half-true? Non-free is not distributed by Debian?


> People wanting FDL in main want to distribute non-free stuff. 

Hm... Can you prove it? Software in non-free is clearly non-free. While 
FDL seems to be disputable on this list.


> (And this even wrongly labeled and as part of Debian, in contrary 
>  to those who want to support non-free stuff in general and
>  FDL-manuals in special to help our users until there are proper
>  replacements.)

So distributing non-free is a good thing? Do you really think, that you 
help users when you distribute non-free?

--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov