Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: Sergey Spiridonov <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:45:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] bhiklo$33n$2@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnbjpg4m.3q4.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
References: <[🔎] 1060732005.26001.33.camel@bohr> <[🔎] bhcp7l$rbf$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 8765l1k88v.fsf@wasp.nowan.org> <[🔎] bhe41a$8va$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1060809711.18923.211.camel@gargantubrain.dartmouth.edu> <[🔎] bhelik$7h4$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 948.1060832172@mixed> <[🔎] bhfakg$124$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1504.1060872594@mixed> <[🔎] bhgod0$j2v$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20030814204638.GL13227@tennyson.netexpress.net> <[🔎] 20030814204638.GL13227@tennyson.netexpress.net> <[🔎] bhi975$htb$2@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] slrnbjpg4m.3q4.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>

MJ Ray wrote:

Please explain, other than the FDL's creation, what has changed in the
nature of software and documentation that makes the DFSG outdated?

1. It seems that DFSG does not make clear which version of 2 possible"software" definitions it mean. Probably there was only one definitionat the time DFSG was created (or one definition was just missed).

2. New license which depends on differnce between software anddocumentation appears.

--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Sergey Spiridonov <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included
Next by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread