On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:47:00PM +0200, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote: > Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > >That's mostly correct. If only the GFDL did only that. But it also > >forces derived works to "include" the unvariant sections. Also include > > Of course it is, otherwise one can produce a derived work to exclude > invariant section. This would be a hole. Your argument was founded upon the notion that these statements were political opinions and therefore did not need to be, and should not, be modified. How would this be affected by granting the permission to remove the irrelevant crap? [I should point out, again, that we have no real business distributing political statements, and therefore this falls into the "irrelevant" category. The DFSG-freeness of things which have no place in Debian is not really a concern - does it matter that your lunch is not DFSG-free?] -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
pgp2c5kzaemsc.pgp
Description: PGP signature