debian-devel Apr 1998 by date

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 5 of 5

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Apr 28

overwriting directories Adrian Bridgett
Re: X and Window Mangers Branden Robinson
Re: X and Window Mangers Branden Robinson
Re: Licensing, was elvis package Shaya Potter
Re: Licensing, was elvis package Shaya Potter
Re: Licensing, was elvis package Shaya Potter
Re: X and Window Mangers Branden Robinson
Re: CERT* VB-98.04: Vulnerabilities in xterm and Xaw Branden Robinson
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Branden Robinson
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Martin Schulze
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Branden Robinson
Re: CERT* VB-98.04: Vulnerabilities in xterm and Xaw Mark Baker
Re: Licensing, was elvis package Raul Miller
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Thomas Roessler
Re: CERT* VB-98.04: Vulnerabilities in xterm and Xaw Thomas Roessler
Re: PROPOSAL: Services, inetd and xinetd Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: base-files etc. Raul Miller
Re: netstd tools in the base system (was Re: What to do with /bin/perl symlink?) Enrique Zanardi
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Manoj Srivastava
FWD: CERT Vendor-Initiated Bulletin VB-98.04 - xterm.Xaw Joey Hess
Re: X and Window Mangers Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: netstd tools in the base system (was Re: What to do with /bin/perl symlink?) Peter Tobias
Re: PROPOSAL: Services, inetd and xinetd Peter Tobias
Re: Bug#21691: perl-base is essential nothing should Depend: on it. Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Raul Miller
Re: Bug#21691: perl-base is essential nothing should Depend: on it. Michael Alan Dorman
Re: License advice Marcus Brinkmann
disappearance of dists/stable link from ftp archive James A . Treacy
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Raul Miller
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: PROPOSAL: Services, inetd and xinetd Inaky Perez Gonzalez
giftrans Cédric
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Raul Miller
Intent to package eMusic Brian Almeida
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy G John Lapeyre
Re: PROPOSAL: Services, inetd and xinetd Mark Baker
Re: PROPOSAL: Services, inetd and xinetd Thomas Roessler
Re: License advice Stephen Zander
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: FWD: CERT Vendor-Initiated Bulletin VB-98.04 - xterm.Xaw Branden Robinson

Apr 29

Re: X and Window Mangers Joey Hess
Re: X and Window Mangers Joey Hess
Re: X and Window Mangers Joey Hess
The latest XFree86 (3.3.2-4) Branden Robinson
Re: X and Window Mangers Ben Pfaff
Re: RFC: dpkg and handling of the Unconfigured state Jason Gunthorpe
Re: netstd tools in the base system (was Re: What to do with /bin/perl symlink?) Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Boot Disks Lindsay Allen
Re: X and Window Mangers Branden Robinson
Re: X and Window Mangers Joey Hess
Re: X and Window Mangers Ben Pfaff
Re: X and Window Mangers Jason Gunthorpe
Re: X and Window Mangers Branden Robinson
Re: X and Window Mangers Ben Pfaff
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Raul Miller
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Philip Hands
Re: License advice Buddha Buck
Re: netstd tools in the base system (was Re: What to do with /bin/perl symlink?) Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: X and Window Mangers Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: Licensing, was elvis package Shaya Potter
Lilo.. matthew.r.pavlovich.1
Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm? Guy Maor
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: Licensing, was elvis package Mark W. Eichin
Re: disappearance of dists/stable link from ftp archive Guy Maor
Re: Bug#21691: perl-base is essential nothing should Depend: on it. Enrique Zanardi
Re: Bug#21691: perl-base is essential nothing should Depend: on it. Enrique Zanardi
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Mark W. Eichin
Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm? Hamish Moffatt
Re: Lilo.. Oliver Elphick
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: Lilo.. Enrique Zanardi
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Richard Braakman
Re: X and Window Mangers Falk Hueffner
Re: X and Window Mangers Enrique Zanardi
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Thomas Roessler
Re: X and Window Mangers Enrique Zanardi
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Philip Hands
Re: X and Window Mangers Branden Robinson
Re: X and Window Mangers Enrique Zanardi
Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm? Michael Alan Dorman
Re: x 3.3.2-4 Remco Blaakmeer
Re: x 3.3.2-4 Branden Robinson
Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.7) Santiago Vila
problem for qpopper2.4 with shadow password julien ORTEGA
Languages for Description (Was: language for changelog) Yann Dirson
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Dale Scheetz
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: Boot Disks Bob Hilliard
weird effect Hamish Moffatt
uncertain status -ideas and Questions Stephen Carpenter
Re: weird effect Santiago Vila
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy John Lines
xmem ? David Welton
intent to take mawk and gawk Santiago Vila
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Manoj Srivastava
Intent to package: uedit James Troup
Re: intent to take mawk and gawk James Troup
Re: Intent to package: uedit Ben Pfaff
Re: intent to take mawk and gawk Santiago Vila
installation report of hamm 26.4. Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: intent to take mawk and gawk James Troup
Re: Intent to package: uedit Santiago Vila
Re: Intent to package: uedit Jules Bean
Re: Intent to package: uedit Igor Grobman
Maintainers and the Database Giuliano P Procida
Re: intent to take mawk and gawk Santiago Vila
creating hamm cdroms Andreas Jellinghaus
debian 2.0 Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm? Bdale Garbee
Possible DoS attack with new IPlogger release Hugo Haas
Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?) Michael Alan Dorman
Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?) James D. Freels
Re: Intent to package: uedit Richard Braakman
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Raul Miller
Re: installation report of hamm 26.4. Branden Robinson
Re: xmem ? Chris Reed
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution) Marcus Brinkmann
Re: installation report of hamm 26.4. Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Dale Scheetz
Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?) James Troup
Re: xfsft deb package Remco Blaakmeer
Intent to package: xitalk Chris Reed
Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?) Michael Alan Dorman
Re: Intent to package: xitalk Joey Hess

Apr 30

Re: xfsft deb package Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: as much business as you can handle Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Philip Hands
Re: How Debian Linux could be made more secure Raul Miller
New "Stable Distribution Maintainer" Brian White
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: xfsft deb package Stephen Carpenter
Re: X and Window Mangers Raul Miller
Re: as much business as you can handle Hamish Moffatt
Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?) Raul Miller
Re: Licensing, was elvis package Raul Miller
Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution) Raul Miller
Re: Possible DoS attack with new IPlogger release Herbert Xu
on forming a new Linux Distribution Bruce Perens
Re: *** The Upcoming Release of Hamm *** Brian White
Re: xfsft deb package Raul Miller
Re: xfsft deb package Branden Robinson
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy Raul Miller
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Raul Miller
Re: xfsft deb package Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: debian 2.0 Raul Miller
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Raul Miller
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Bruce Perens
Re: as much business as you can handle Stephen Carpenter
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Jason Gunthorpe
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution David Welton
mkisofs (was: creating hamm cdroms) Jens Rosenboom
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Ean Schuessler
Why is dosemu in contrib? Michael Meskes
Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx Michael Meskes
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Philip Hands
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Anthony Fok
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? Herbert Xu
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? Joey Hess
Re: intent to take mawk and gawk Santiago Vila
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? Herbert Xu
RE: Why is dosemu in contrib? Meskes, Michael
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Manoj Srivastava
packaged blt8.0-unoff for unstable Matthias Klose
Re: first proposal for a new maintainer policy James Troup
Re: debian 2.0 James Troup
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy James Troup
Re: installation report of hamm 26.4. Tommi Virtanen
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Raul Miller
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Raul Miller
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Kai Henningsen
Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution) Marcus . Brinkmann
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Tommi Virtanen
Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution) Jules Bean
New Linux distribution Kenneth . Scharf
Re: New Linux distribution Hamish Moffatt
Re: debian 2.0 Raul Miller
RE: netstd tools in the base system (was Re: What to do with /bi n/perl symlink?) Carpenter, Dean
Re: New Linux distribution Scott Ellis
RE: New Linux distribution Patrick Ouellette
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Steve Dunham
Re: debian 2.0 James Troup
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Steve Dunham
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Martin Schulze
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Stephen Carpenter
Re: debian 2.0 Raul Miller
Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx Raul Miller
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Sven Rudolph
Intent to package pine-src Santiago Vila
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Kenneth . Scharf
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? David Welton
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? Stephen Carpenter
Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx David Welton
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Dale Scheetz
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? David Welton
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? Jeff Noxon
Re: Intent to package pine-src Dale Scheetz
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? Jules Bean
Debian Source distributions (was Re: Intent to package pine-src) Jules Bean
Re: Intent to package pine-src Stephen Carpenter
Re: Intent to package pine-src Santiago Vila
Re: Intent to package pine-src Santiago Vila
Re: Intent to package pine-src Raul Miller
Re: Debian Source distributions (was Re: Intent to package pine-src) Santiago Vila
Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx Bruce Perens
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Bruce Perens
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Marcus Brinkmann
Seeking other archs to build packages on Shaleh
RE: on forming a new Linux Distribution Patrick Ouellette
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution john
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Bruce Perens
**Ready your Flame-Throwers** Ian Keith Setford
Re: New "Stable Distribution Maintainer" Martin Schulze
Re: **Ready your Flame-Throwers** Stephen Carpenter
RE: **Ready your Flame-Throwers** Patrick Ouellette
Ease of use and configurability Branden Robinson
Re: The latest XFree86 (3.3.2-4) Alexander Shumakovitch
Re: **Ready your Flame-Throwers** Raul Miller
Re: Intent to package pine-src Igor Grobman
Improvement ;) vaidhy
Re: Improvement ;) Shaleh
Re: The latest XFree86 (3.3.2-4) Branden Robinson
Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?) Jesse Goldman
Re: Intent to package pine-src Dale Scheetz
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: Intent to package pine-src Raul Miller
result from "new distribution" argument Bruce Perens
Re: Intent to package pine-src Dale Scheetz
Re: on forming a new Linux Distribution Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Dale Scheetz
Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?) Yann Dirson
Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: Ease of use and configurability Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Intent to package pine-src Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx Raul Miller
Re: Ease of use and configurability Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Conflicts between developers and policy Marcus Brinkmann
Mnemonic? (possible intent to package...) Bear Giles
Re: Intent to package pine-src Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: Ease of use and configurability Branden Robinson
Re: Intent to package pine-src Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: Intent to package pine-src Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: Intent to package pine-src Dale Scheetz
Re: Intent to package pine-src James Troup
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: Why is dosemu in contrib? Rev. Joseph Carter
Re: The latest XFree86 (3.3.2-4) Alexander Shumakovitch
Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx Rev. Joseph Carter

May 01

Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx James A . Treacy
Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?) Joel Klecker
Intent to do a non-maintainer release of shadow-980403. Joel Klecker
tetex: symlink "loop" Tim Bell
Re: Improvement ;) Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Intent to package pine-src Raul Miller
Re: monochrome cards Bear Giles
Re: monochrome cards Raul Miller
Re: monochrome cards Jason Gunthorpe
Re: monochrome cards stephen . p . ryan
Re: monochrome cards Raul Miller
Re: monochrome cards Bear Giles
Re: Improvement ;) Hamish Moffatt
Re: monochrome cards Hamish Moffatt

The last update was on 03:44 GMT Sun Jun 09. There are 2270 messages. Page 5 of 5.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 5 of 5

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc