Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?)
At 00:31 +0100 1998-04-30, James Troup wrote:
>Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@law.miami.edu> writes:
>
>> [ ... ] ld.so doesn't apply [ ... ]
>
>Upgrade your quinn-diff :-) From 0.31's ChangeLog.main :-
>
>| Sun Apr 12 21:33:14 1998 James Troup <jjtroup@comp.brad.ac.uk>
>|
>| * Packages-arch-specific (ldso): exclude alpha.
>
>(Maybe it should also be excluded for the other glibc only
>architectures too? I always welcome input on Packages-arch-specific as
>I'm only qualified to speak for m68k (and then only barely))
powerpc is the only other glibc-only architecture in Debian, AFAIK.
You'll need to add powerpc to ldso's exclude list too.
--
Joel "Espy" Klecker <mailto:jk@espy.org> <http://web.espy.org/>
Debian GNU/Linux Developer...................<http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: