Re: Conflicts between developers and policy
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> Well, policy means something which has been adopted by a body. Hace
> we actually done so? Am I saying we interpret the contents of the
> policy documents differently? no, but the significance of the policy
> documents definitely shall change.
Er... debian-policy is a distillation of debian efforts for quite some
time. Until you decided that it was somehow bogus, I would have said
it was fairly well accepted as debian policy. [The exceptions would be
where people weren't aware of it.]
And, near as I can tell, the reason you becaome so combative about
debian policy being debian policy was that Ian Jackson made a statement
to the effect that it was sufficient for policy to be policy.
Frankly, it seems like you either weren't paying attention, or
didn't understand.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: