debian-policy Aug 1999 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 2 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
The "four objections" thing (was Re: /usr/share/doc: some new proposals) /usr/doc transition and other things /usr/doc vs. /usr/share/doc - the decision Re: /usr/share/doc (was Re: weekly policy summary) /usr/share/doc request (don't!) (was Re: policy summary for past two weeks) /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened Re: /usr/share/doc: some new proposals Re: /var/lib, /var/mail RE: [PROPOSAL] Archive audit, cruft removal, unmaintained packag [PROPOSAL] Archive audit, cruft removal, unmaintained packages [PROPOSAL] changing policy on compiling with -g .. a better way [PROPOSAL] Directories for local initialization scripts Architecture-specific example files Away notice Bug#37999: du -S'ing the archive (was: Re: weekly policy summary) Re: Bug#40706: Reasons for not moving at all Re: Bug#40706: usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc Bug#40766: Rewrite of "configuration files" section Bug#40767: PROPOSED] wording cleanup w.r.t. conffile/configuration Bug#41113: Proposal: Naming Conventions for modules Bug#41121: Add VISUAL when checking for users editor Bug#41121: PROPOSED] Add VISUAL when checking for user's editor Bug#41232: AMENDMENT 1999-07-23 FINAL DRAFT] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: AMENDMENT 1999-07-23] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: Bug #41232: [AMENDMENT 1999-07-23] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: Bug #41232: [AMENDMENT 1999-07-23] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: Bug #41232: [AMENDMENT 1999-07-23] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on b Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41547: update-rc.d and filerc (was: Re: weekly policy summary) Bug#42052: #42052: [PROPOSAL] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail Bug#42052: PROPOSAL] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail Bug#42236: shlibs without a version (was Re: weekly policy summary) Bug#42236: weekly policy summary Bug#42358: policy says /var/lib/games, FHS says /var/games Bug#42432: debian-policy: Proposal for CTV for Draft for Proof of Concept for Draft for Proposal for Proposal for CTV for a CTV to decide on a proposal for a CTV for the CTV on whether or not we shoud have a CTV on the /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc transition now, or later. Bug#42432: marked as done (debian-policy: Proposal for CTV for Draft for Proof of Concept for Draft for Proposal for Proposal for CTV for a CTV to decide on a proposal for a CTV for the CTV on whether or not we shoud have a CTV on the /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc transition now, or later.) Bug#42477: [PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Bug#42477: PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Re: Bug#42477: PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Bug#42477: PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Bug#42477: PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Bug#42477: PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Bug#42477: PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Bug#42477: PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato Bug#42554: A proposal for README.Debian Bug#42634: [PROPOSAL] Automatic migration to /usr/share/doc Bug#42634: PROPOSAL] Automatic migration to /usr/share/doc Bug#42849: er Bug#42849: What would the tree look like? (was Re: er) Bug#43077: [Proposal]: Remove the incompatibility argument from 5.1 Bug#43483: [proposal] section 3.2 should not allow static user ids (except root=0). Bug#43529: debian-policy: mail locking in Debian is _not_ NFS safe Bug#43651: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] mailbox locking Bug#43757: My emacs can't find some info files Consistent location of files in -doc packages. core recovery tools, apt-get, and dpkg should be static Re: Data section (#38902) er Finally found one! (Was:Architecture-specific example files) Hard-coding release names in policy (was Re: [PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition) How we got here, and how to prevent it from happening again. Re: I'd like to coordinate a major update of stable Re: I'm sorry to open another can of worms but.. /usr/share/man transition I'm sorry to open another can of worms but.. /usr/share/man transition ispell-dictionary (Re: weekly policy summary) Let's just convert debhelper and do NMUs Re: Lintian and manpage for X app location of debian policy manuals in dwww Mail locking and NFS caches. Re: Moving to the FHS: not right now! Opinion on Debian freeze, FHS & IPv6 Other FHS issues (was Re: /usr/share/doc: some new proposals) policy summary for past two weeks Processed: Processed: Bug#41232: debian-policy: [ACCEPTED] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.0.1.1 Processed: Maintainer unknown Processed: Re: *wav* executable are not setgid audio. Processed: Re: Bug#42477: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSED} delay the /usr/doc transition till after potato) Processed: Re: Bug#42849: er Processed: Re: Bug#43787: [PROPOSAL] changing policy on compiling with -g .. a better way Processed: renaming this since it has several seconds The last update was on 15:58 GMT Sat May 11. There are 538 messages. Page 1 of 2.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 2
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc