[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened



> > IMHO, packages that
> > started using /usr/share/doc were premature in that usage 
> Your opinion is wrong.
> Those packages follow current policy.  Not using /usr/share/doc in a
> standards-version >= 3.0.0 package is a policy violation.

 The policy was immature. And look at all the packages still being uploaded
with docs in /usr/doc --> lots of maintainers have noticed that the policy
was immature.

 (or is it inmature? =) )


Reply to: