Re: /usr/doc transition and other things
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 03:01:58AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > It's a lot of
> > overhead for packages with close-to-nothing in /usr(/share)?/doc.
> Then those packages are welcome to stay in /usr/doc, if complying with the
> transition strategy irks the maintainer too much. When policy changes,
> they'll just have to be prepared to move more or less immediately,
> without as much time for debugging as everyone else had.
That's all I'm asking for. (And I'm not sure what "debugging" is
involved, but that's a side issue.)
> I'm getting to the point where I'd like all docs to be either manpages
> or info files.
Wouldn't it be nice?! :-)
cheers
--
Chris Waters xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
Reply to: