Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 08:56:10PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Are you saying I should be actively violating Policy?
Oops, I think I misread Joseph. Sorry.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
"... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ..."
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Kristoffer.Rose@ENS-Lyon.FR
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu>
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu>
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu>
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>