Re: core recovery tools, apt-get, and dpkg should be static
Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu> writes:
> > No it's not. Every bash upgrade blows it away without notice or comment.
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 06:20:13PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Yes, but that's considered to be a bug. I agree that it's a bug that
> *needs* to be fixed. Ok, it's *supposed* to be an option already. :-)
For what it's worth, you can do:
dpkg-divert /bin/sh
and it's completely under local control..
--
Raul
Reply to:
- References:
- core recovery tools, apt-get, and dpkg should be static
- From: Justin Wells <jread@semiotek.com>
- Re: core recovery tools, apt-get, and dpkg should be static
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: core recovery tools, apt-get, and dpkg should be static
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu>
- Re: core recovery tools, apt-get, and dpkg should be static
- From: Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net>
- Re: core recovery tools, apt-get, and dpkg should be static
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@itri.loyola.edu>
- Re: core recovery tools, apt-get, and dpkg should be static
- From: Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net>