Re: policy summary for past two weeks
Hi,
>>"Joseph" == Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:
Joseph> But it has been abused, quite seriously. Popularity contests
Joseph> HAVE been used to defeat sound technical solution to a purely
Joseph> technical problem. Given that the policy guidelines are not
Joseph> meant to resolve technical issues of any controversial
Joseph> nature, they're pretty much limited to fixing typos and
Joseph> there's no point to needing proposals and seconds for that.
Joseph> Structure is good to keep things moving, but the individual
Joseph> developers need to be able to be part of it. OTOH, what we
Joseph> have now is essentially chaotic bureaucratic process, with
Joseph> all the faults of such systems such as the now month or so
Joseph> we've been arguing over this and gotten nowhere. In fact, if
Joseph> anything IMO we've taken a few steps backwards in the
Joseph> process.
Joseph> Of course this is all 20/20 hindsight.
Yes. The whole process was predicated on the assumption that
people on the list are cooperative, and are indeed trying to reach a
compromise, and that the formal objection process would not be used
except as a last resort.
I would be very sad if we can't even do that.
I had hoped that formal objections would not be used to
derail a proposal that one did not like, but to nip in the bud any
egregiously unworkable proposals. Maybe this should have been spelled
out.
Joseph> We apparently need to find some way to deal with
Joseph> controversial technical issues. A month's senseless flaming
Joseph> and then appealing to the technical committee is going to get
Joseph> slightly annoying.
Is it too late to ask people to behave and try and work together?
Instead of object first, and talk later?
manoj
--
compuberty, n: The uncomfortable period of emotional and hormonal
changes a computer experiences when the operating system is upgraded
and a sun4 is put online sharing files.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: