debian-legal Aug 2004 by thread
[Date Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
- Invitation Isabella
- Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: New ocaml licence proposal. Sven Luther
- Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge] Francesco Poli
- Re: SRP Andres Salomon
- Re: MySQL FOSS Exception Andres Salomon
- Re: Web application licenses Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Free Debian logos? Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Daniel Stone
- Re: Quick(?) Questions on Choice of Law & Venue Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: Choice of venue argumentation. Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: question: Mozilla relicensing progress Branden Robinson
- Re: the meaning of 'the same terms" in DFSG 3, and why the QPL fails it (was: An old question of EGE's) Branden Robinson
- Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance Branden Robinson
- Re: [htdig-dev] Licensing issues... Branden Robinson
- Re: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Steve McIntyre
- acceptable copyright? Jörgen Hägg
- Re: Re: Failure Aktivitetskalender
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Walter Landry
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andreas Barth
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Branden Robinson
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Nelson
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Nico Golde
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Branden Robinson
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Sven Luther
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue ivan-debian
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue MJ Ray
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Nelson
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue MJ Ray
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Nelson
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue MJ Ray
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Nelson
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Florian Weimer
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Sven Luther
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Sven Luther
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Nelson
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Nelson
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Josh Triplett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue MJ Ray
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Adam McKenna
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Sven Luther
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Sven Luther
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Sven Luther
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Brian Thomas Sniffen
- miboot floppies and non-free apple boot sector. Sven Luther
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Glenn Maynard
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Matthew Garrett
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Glenn Maynard
- Measuring divergence, was: Suggestions of David Nusinow MJ Ray
- Re: Measuring divergence, was: Suggestions of David Nusinow Matthew Garrett
- Re: Measuring divergence, was: Suggestions of David Nusinow MJ Ray
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Steve McIntyre
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue MJ Ray
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue David Nusinow
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Steve McIntyre
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Steve McIntyre
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Steve McIntyre
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Andrew Suffield
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Glenn Maynard
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue MJ Ray
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue David Nusinow
- Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue Branden Robinson
- [Fwd: Re: httping license issues] David Moreno Garza
- Mozilla relicensing progress Gervase Markham
- Debian domain in Japan (Was: Please add us to debian CD vendors list) Craig Small
- Re: W3 software license Branden Robinson
- Bits from debian-legal between 2004-08-02 and 2004-08-08 MJ Ray
- Netatalk and OpenSSL licencing Freek Dijkstra
- New MySQL "Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) Exception" licence.... (re #242449) Christian Hammers
- Re: Bug#248853: 3270: 5250 emulation code, all rights reserved Richard A Nelson
- nmap license MOB JUNKY
- mysql license and python-mysqldb Jonas Meurer
- Free & open DRM software Brian M Hunt
- Conditions vs. (possibly inaccurate) notices (was Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay? Nathanael Nerode
- NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Joe Moore
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. MJ Ray
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Walter Landry
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Walter Landry
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Walter Landry
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Glenn Maynard
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Glenn Maynard
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Francesco Poli
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Glenn Maynard
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Francesco Poli
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Glenn Maynard
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Francesco Poli
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Glenn Maynard
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Francesco Poli
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Glenn Maynard
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Francesco Poli
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Francesco Poli
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Bernhard R. Link
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Steve McIntyre
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Sven Luther
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Michael Poole
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge. Raul Miller
- GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Michael Poole
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Michael Poole
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Adam McKenna
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Michael Poole
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Marco Franzen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal) Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Adam McKenna
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Michael Poole
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Michael Poole
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Michael Poole
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Adam McKenna
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" David Schleef
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Adam Sampson
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Adam Sampson
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Glenn Maynard
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Raul Miller
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Glenn Maynard
- Re: GPL "or any greater version" Brian Thomas Sniffen
The last update was on 10:45 GMT Mon May 20. There are 830 messages. Page 1 of 2.
[Date Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc