[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay?

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 09:31, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:03:33PM +0000, Jim Marhaus wrote:
> > "Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License"
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/02/msg00229.html
> Clause 4 of the license posted at the start of this thread is, with the
> execption of whos names it protects, word-for-word identical.
> Am I missing something?

Yes. Clause 3 is the GPL-incompatible non-free one. Clause 4 is standard
boilerplate, found in many licenses (it's also superfluous, being
written into copyright by default in US law).
Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: