Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
On 2004-08-10 10:37:28 +0100 Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org>
[...] as i don't really have time for another monster debian-legal
flamewar, and am more busy getting my packages ready for the sarge
than nit picking here.
Well, don't post flamebait to debian-legal that seems to suggest that
legal bugfixing is nit picking if you don't like flames :P
[...] in the next year or so, in followup to the CECILL licencing
Please, I'd appreciate any news on ocaml moving to CECILL being posted
to debian-legal, if you can do that. TIA.
The Compiler is distributed under the terms of the Q Public License
version 1.0 (included below).
I don't think this is still "the" QPL after the (permitted) edits, but
"a" QPL. A similar description contributed to the Oslo/Amsterdamn
problem in the QPL summary draft.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL;
Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast