Re: W3 software license
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 05:36:29PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>>The license looks OK to me, with the possible exception that it says
> >>>"obtaining, using and/or copying this work" implies acceptance of the
> > I think it sets a bad precedent to wave such language into a
> > list of licenses we accept as DFSG-free without at least asking the
> > upstream authors to remove this wording.
Why don't we do this: I'll write up a summary of the license, and note that we
think that works released under the license would, barring complications, be
I'll also add a suggestion to drop the use language.
How does that sound?