evan@debian.org wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 05:36:29PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>>>>The license looks OK to me, with the possible exception that it says >>>>>"obtaining, using and/or copying this work" implies acceptance of the >>>>>license. >>>I think it sets a bad precedent to wave such language into a >>>list of licenses we accept as DFSG-free without at least asking the >>>upstream authors to remove this wording. > > Why don't we do this: I'll write up a summary of the license, and note that we > think that works released under the license would, barring complications, be > free. > > I'll also add a suggestion to drop the use language. > > How does that sound? Sounds great. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature