Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay?
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:33:16PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 13:35, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:15:09AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > > Brian, stop calling the MIT and 3 clause BSD licenses non-free. If
> > > anyone needed evidence that debian-legal has become overreaching and
> > > useless, it's here.
> >
> > Please note that is not a consensus here.
>
> Actually, it was consensus here when the X-Oz license was examined back
> in February. Branden Robinson[0] declared the clause in question
> non-free, and the final summary posted by Simon Law[1] also referred to
> the clause as problematic.
Just a question, which version of the X-Oz licence does this summary affect ?
The original one, or the later reworked by Dawes one ?
The one under discussion here seems to be the original one, which is very
similar to the original MIT/X licence.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: