Re: GPL "or any greater version"

[Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>]

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 09:46:56PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> It seems there are two rough interpretations: that "v2 or later" is dual-
> licensing (or "dual, triple, etc-licensing"), and GPL#9 merely explains
> that, affirms it and recommends it; or that GPL#9 makes an explicit
> licensing requirement of it, such that it becomes "locked in" by GPL#6.

If someone at the FSF does claim officially that the first is possible,
could you also ask how this is supposed to be done?

[For example, is it legal to remove the "or later versions" copyright
notices?]

Thanks,

-- 
Raul