On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:33:26AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > evan@debian.org wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 05:36:29PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > >> Branden Robinson: > >>> Josh Triplett: > >>>The license looks OK to me, with the possible exception that it says > >>>"obtaining, using and/or copying this work" implies acceptance of the > >>>license. [...] > >>I think it sets a bad precedent to wave such language into a > >>list of licenses we accept as DFSG-free without at least asking the > >>upstream authors to remove this wording. > > > > Why don't we do this: I'll write up a summary of the license, and note that we > > think that works released under the license would, barring complications, be > > free. > > > > I'll also add a suggestion to drop the use language. > > > > How does that sound? > > Sounds great. Any progress on this? -- G. Branden Robinson | Arguments, like men, are often Debian GNU/Linux | pretenders. branden@debian.org | -- Plato http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature