[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GPL "or any greater version"



Raul Miller wrote [in reply to Michael Poole]:
You seem to be claiming that the GPL implicitly allows the constraint
"no future versions of the GPL may be used" as if that constraint were
written into the license (see section 8 for an explicit example of this
kind of language).

That is not a constraint on the licence, it *is* the licence.

The licence is just what is detailed in a particular version of the licence text. Different versions are different licences.

Since these licences all have the same name, a licensor would normally
have to specify the version in addition to the name in order to make
a meaningful grant (or at least there might be some doubt).

Section 9 of GPLv2 clarifies how that licence *can*
co-exist with a (potentially infinite) number of further licences
also granted (most of which have not yet been written) *if* the grant
is worded in certain ways.

--
Marco



Reply to: