[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: acceptable copyright?



On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 09:24, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Aug 2004, Jörgen Hägg wrote:
> 
> > /* |   Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software   | */
> > /* |   and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby | */
>                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > /* |   granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all | */
> > /* |   copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission  | */
> > /* |   notice appear in supporting documentation.  This software is    | */
> > /* |   provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.           | */
> > /* +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ */
> 
> Does this mean I may not charge for distrubution?  (DFSG #1).

Not usually. This is a standard clause that means the author is letting
you exercise the formerly listed freedoms without paying him or her
money.
-- 
Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: