debian-devel Mar 2005 by author

[previous page]

Page 6 of 6

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Thiemo Seufer

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: dehs will stop Mar 06
Re: dehs will stop Mar 06
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14

Thijs Kinkhorst

Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: about Nybbles : how to keep all those archs releasable complying with the Vancouver Project Mar 16
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Back to basic (was: Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15

Thomas Bushnell BSG

Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Mar 20
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Is Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org> MIA? Mar 13
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 31
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 20
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: status of buildds? Mar 16
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Another load of typos Mar 17
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 20
Re: Ubuntu Patches Mar 22
Re: Required firewall support Mar 17
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 12
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 13
Re: Idea: about package installation under chroot. Mar 25
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
status of buildds? Mar 15
Re: status of buildds? Mar 15
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 17
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: NEW handling ... Mar 20
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Mar 19
Re: Required firewall support Mar 17
Re: s390 not currently projected releasable (was: Re: Dropping from mirror network vs dropping from tier-1) Mar 16
Re: arch-specific packages and the new SCC requirements Mar 18
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Running bash before the system boots Mar 16
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 17
arch-specific packages and the new SCC requirements Mar 16
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 31
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 20
Re: Questions for the DPL candidates Mar 14
Re: Required firewall support Mar 17
Re: status of buildds? Mar 17
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 12
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: buildd queue starvation (Was: Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!) Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: status of buildds? Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 26
Re: Required firewall support Mar 16
Re: status of buildds? Mar 16
Re: Another load of typos Mar 15
Required firewall support Mar 16
Re: Another load of typos Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: The sarge release disaster - some thoughts Mar 16
Re: Required firewall support Mar 19
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 31
Re: status of buildds? Mar 15
Re: Idea: about package installation under chroot. Mar 24
Re: Ubuntu Patches Mar 22
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Required firewall support Mar 17
Re: status of buildds? Mar 15
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 27
Re: status of buildds? Mar 16
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Apr 01
Re: NEW handling ... Mar 20
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 26
Re: Another load of typos Mar 18
Re: arch-specific packages and the new SCC requirements Mar 16
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Mar 15
Re: Idea: about package installation under chroot. Mar 25
Re: status of buildds? Mar 15
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 12
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 17
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 20
Re: Idea: about package installation under chroot. Mar 26
Re: s390 not currently projected releasable (was: Re: Dropping from mirror network vs dropping from tier-1) Mar 16
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: mipsel drop / buildd situation Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space] Mar 07
How to join a team Mar 16
Re: Another load of typos Mar 17
Re: Ubuntu Patches Mar 22
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: buildd queue starvation (Was: Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!) Mar 13
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: dpatch and patching debian/rules Mar 31
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Problems in the buildd network (was: Re: s390 not currently projected releasable) Mar 16
Re: Is Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org> MIA? Mar 14
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 31
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 17
Re: s390 not currently projected releasable Mar 15
Re: s390 not currently projected releasable Mar 15
Re: Ubuntu Patches Mar 22
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 12
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 13
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 28
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 12
Re: Required firewall support Mar 18
Re: Required firewall support Mar 21
Re: status of buildds? Mar 16
Re: Ubuntu Patches Mar 22
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 17
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 27
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Mar 20
Re: s390 not currently projected releasable (was: Re: Dropping from mirror network vs dropping from tier-1) Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 22
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 27
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 27
Re: Idea: about package installation under chroot. Mar 24
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 15
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...) Mar 24
Re: Not every package should enter Debian (was: Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns))) Mar 14
Re: SCC proposal (was: Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 15
Re: Two thougts about testing Mar 22
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 20
Re: Is Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org> MIA? Mar 14
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Apr 01
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 19
Re: status of buildds? Mar 15
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 26
Re: Required firewall support Mar 17
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 31
help with bug 296693 Mar 04
Re: status of buildds? Mar 16
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Apr 01
Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 26
Re: s390 not currently projected releasable (was: Re: Dropping from mirror network vs dropping from tier-1) Mar 15
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 27
Re: Required firewall support Mar 17
Re: status of buildds? Mar 16
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 26

Thomas Dickey

Re: Accepted vile 9.4-r1 (powerpc sparc i386 source all) Mar 15

Thomas Hood

Re: Stateless linux in Debian Mar 11
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 12
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 08
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 09
Re: Switchconf: Orphaning or removing? Mar 09
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 10
Should Debian use lsb init-functions? Mar 26
Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels] Mar 24
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 06
Re: Ubuntu Patches Mar 21
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 09
Who uses libasound2-plugins? Mar 26
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 10

Thomas Petazzoni

Bug#298117: ITP: camlrpc -- Ocaml Sun RPC libraries Mar 04

Thomas Schneller

Re: Serious kernel problems on new i386 hardware Mar 10

Thomas Viehmann

Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Mar 20
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 04
Re: Key management using a USB key Mar 16
Re: Bug #298195: ITP: tinywm -- Ridiculously tiny window manager Mar 06
Re: A new arch support proposal, hopefully consensual (?) Mar 20
Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ? Mar 06

Tiago Bortoletto Vaz

Bug#301601: ITP: bbclone -- A PHP based Web Counter on Steroids Mar 27

Tilman Koschnick

Re: Bug#298056: ITP: debsync -- synchronise the installed packages lists on several machines Mar 04

Tim Cutts

Re: NoX idea Mar 02

Tim Peeler

Bug#301260: ITP: achims-guestbook -- php driven guestbook Mar 24

Tollef Fog Heen

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: intend-to-implement: script to obtain Debian Source Mar 31
Re: s390 not currently projected releasable Mar 16
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 22
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 17
Re: Etch and multi-arch Mar 14
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Edge and multi-arch Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Restrictive SMTP server Mar 14
Re: Not every package should enter Debian Mar 14
Re: [Debian-ppc64-devel] Call For Help - Please support the ppc64 architecture Mar 20
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: intend-to-implement: script to obtain Debian Source Mar 31
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Mar 15
Re: automake/autoconf in build-dependencies Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 22
Re: status of buildds? Mar 15
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 31
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Development files for manipulating Debian packages Mar 30
Re: self-depending packages Mar 01
Re: Bug#297629: ITP: gallery2 -- web-based photo album written in PHP Mar 02
Re: Mirror Network Mar 14
Re: Why are you guys using user space utilities not written by us that seem to not work? Could you change who is the debian maintainer for us? Mar 01
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: intend-to-implement: script to obtain Debian Source Mar 31
Re: pyblosxom up for adoption Mar 01
Re: NoX idea Mar 02
Re: self-depending packages Mar 02
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Key management using a USB key Mar 09
Re: NEW handling ... Mar 21

Toni Mueller

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16

Torsten Landschoff

Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Mar 17
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 13
Re: automake/autoconf in build-dependencies Mar 13
Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Mar 16
Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Mar 15
Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Mar 24
Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Mar 17
debconf in while read foo; ... loop? Mar 11
[RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Mar 15
Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Mar 21
Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade Mar 16
Re: is xprint still used by mozilla, etc? Mar 11
Migration back from libdb4.3 -> libdb4.2, libdb4.3 broken Mar 18
Re: Another load of typos Mar 17

Torsten Werner

Bug#300578: ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar -- Mozilla Firefox Arabic Language/Region Package Mar 20

Turbo Fredriksson

Re: Bug#299918: ITP: php4-kadm5 -- MIT Kerberos5 remote administration module for PHP4 Mar 27

Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 18
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code] Mar 16

Vincent Zweije

Re: How to detect which user is connected to $DISPLAY Mar 27

W. Borgert

Re: Example for use of dh_strip --dbg-package=... and CDBS? Mar 03
Example for use of dh_strip --dbg-package=... and CDBS? Mar 02

Wesley J Landaker

Re: Another load of typos Mar 15
Re: Bug#299724: ITP: groach -- pests such as roaches hide under your windows (xroach clone) Mar 16

Wesley J. Landaker

Will Newton

Re: UK Meetings Mar 07
Re: SCC proposal (was: Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 15
Re: Another load of typos Mar 17

William Ballard

Re: An idea from a Debian user Mar 17

William Vera

Bug#299754: ITP: NanoBlogger -- small weblog engine for the UNIX command line Mar 16
Bug#301585: ITP: png2html -- transforms a PNG image to a web page Mar 27

Wouter Verhelst

Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code] Mar 21
Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels Mar 31
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Mar 21
Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: mipsel drop / buildd situation Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space] Mar 09
Re: m68k (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting) Mar 15
Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code] Mar 16
Re: buildd queue starvation (Was: Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!) Mar 14
Re: mipsel drop / buildd situation Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space] Mar 09
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: How to define a release architecture Mar 22
Re: grass and Packages-arch-specific Mar 08
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Required firewall support Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus Mar 22
Re: buildd queue starvation (Was: Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!) Mar 14
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 20
Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications Mar 23
Re: How to define a release architecture Mar 22
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: status of buildds? Mar 16
Re: intend-to-implement: script to obtain Debian Source Mar 25
Re: How to define a release architecture Mar 22
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: How to define a release architecture Mar 28
Re: *seconded* Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: Should Debian use lsb init-functions? Mar 29
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: combining fakeroot and distcc/SSH Mar 08
Re: Automatic building of (parts of) the archive Mar 09
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Mar 21
Re: FW: Contact Information Mar 30
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: Is there Linux operating system for Nokia mobile devices? Mar 14
Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390 ... [or have strict arch: control? ] Mar 01
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Mar 22
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: How to define a release architecture Mar 22
Re: Idea: about package installation under chroot. Mar 25
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 16
Re: Key management using a USB key Mar 08
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Mar 22
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 22
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 14
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 14
Re: How to show $arch releaseability (was: Re: How to define a release architecture) Mar 22
Re: Should Debian use lsb init-functions? Mar 28
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 16
Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds! Mar 20
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 17
Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 21
Re: SCC proposal (was: Re: Questions for the DPL candidates) Mar 15
Re: mipsel drop / buildd situation Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space] Mar 08
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: Buildd redundancy (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver...) Mar 21
Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting Mar 15
Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)? Mar 21
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications) Mar 21
Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria Mar 21

y

Bug#297637: ITP: html2latex -- HTML to LaTeX conversor Mar 02

The last update was on 11:30 GMT Wed Jun 05. There are 2833 messages. Page 6 of 6.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 6 of 6

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc