Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The inclusion of ia64 in the release count is a projection, based on
> where I believe things are today. Nothing the release team is doing
> ensures that ia64 is going to be a viable port, a year from now when
> we're trying to release etch; and nothing says that one or more of the
> other ports won't be in a position to meet those criteria and get added
> to the release list.
How can they be, since they will be off in another archive? You can't
decide now to put an arch in scc and at the same time say you won't
know whether it's in tier1 or tier2 until etch is close to release.