Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates)
Ben Collins <email@example.com> writes:
> The requirement sucks, lets leave it at that. If the machine dies, I can
> have two to replace it within a day or two.
> The point being, there's no reason to have two seperate machines when one
> can do the job. As long as it keeps up, then there should be no cause for
If you have one machine, and it dies, and it takes you a day or two to
replace it, then it cannot "do the job". If you can guarantee that it
never dies (somehow), then maybe it could.