Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Steve Langasek <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 10:47:15PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > The sh and hurd-i386 ports don't currently meet the SCC requirements, as
> > > neither has a running autobuilder or is keeping up with new packages.
> > It is impossible for any port under development to meet the SCC
> > requirements. We need a place for such ports. Where will it be?
> On the contrary, the amd64 port does, and is currently maintained
> completely outside official debian.org infrastructure.
The amd64 port did not always. Ports under development take time; the
amb64 port is at a late state in its development. I don't understand
why autobuilding is important to SCC; maybe if you could explain that
I would understand.