Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Matthew Garrett <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> It's not clear that an FTP site really satisfies that, and it's also the
> case that this is the FSF's interpretation rather than being the one
> that all GPL copyright holders hold. I'd worry that we might fall foul
> of some (seemingly valid) GPL interpretations.
If the relevant tools were to automatically fetch from the right
place, and we have administrative control over both, then we certainly
do come under that statement.