Re: Not every package should enter Debian (was: Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)))

To: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Not every package should enter Debian (was: Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)))
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 14 Mar 2005 02:15:54 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87acp67cth.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] pan.2005.03.14.08.47.18.76368@smurf.noris.de>
References: <E1D7Bir-0007tg-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 1110279932.422d86fc78446@imp4-q.free.fr> <[🔎] 20050308145503.GC22084@dat.etsit.upm.es> <[🔎] 200503081943.01786@fortytwo.ch> <[🔎] pan.2005.03.14.08.47.18.76368@smurf.noris.de>

Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de> writes:

> That being said, sources which just sprout new binary packages really
> should be passed through NEW automagically.

I made a foolish mistake not too long ago that would never have been
caught by this mechanism; I was most grateful for Anthony Towns
working with me to do it correctly.

Thomas

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not every package should enter Debian (was: Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)))
  - From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>

References:
- Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns))
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns))
  - From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Not every package should enter Debian (was: Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)))
  - From: Adrian von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
- Re: Not every package should enter Debian (was: Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)))
  - From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Is Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org> MIA?
Next by Date: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Previous by thread: Re: Not every package should enter Debian
Next by thread: Re: Not every package should enter Debian (was: Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread