On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:04:26PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > >> The first. Basically upstream changes the database format quite often. > >> I am even not entirely sure if the database format stays compatible in > >> the 2.1 or 2.2 line but I'd expect it to. The 2.2.23 Debian packages > >> uses libdb4.3 instead of libdb4.2 as used in 2.1.x so the reload has to > >> be done in any case. > > Just to be very clear on this again. You do *not* want to run OpenLDAP > against BDB 4.3. Releasing Debian with its OpenLDAP compiled against BDB > 4.3 would be a serious mistake. And this is why? So far 2.2.23 with libdb4.3 seems to be much more stable than anything before. Greetings Torsten
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature