Re: .d.o machines which are down (Re: Questions for the DPL candidates)
Ben Collins <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > In article <[🔎] 20050315121332.GI1437@internal> you write:
> > >I have an e3500 to replace both auric and vore (and the raid), but I
> > >haven't gotten an ok from James to do so yet.
> > That would cut the number of sparc buildds down to one, when two are
> > required for RC archtectures under the new proposal.
> That's ok because two buildd's can run on the one machine. It has 6 cpu's.
That cannot be the requirement. The point has to be an additional and
independently functioning piece of hardware. If the disk blows or it
is compromised or something, the others should be able to continue.