Re: status of buildds?
Ingo Juergensmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:44:03AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > > > It's the job of w-b admins to add new buildds in a timely manner. If they
> > > > > don't do that, they simply fail (one significant part of) their job.
> > > > > This not only happens to s390 now but already happened in the past to m68k
> > > > > for example.
> > > > Ok, let's assume that's true. (I'm not sure it is, but for the sake
> > > > of argument.)
> > > Why shouldn't it be true?
> > I don't have the facts of the matter; I have your assertions, and
> > nothing else.
> You should know me better in the meanwhile that I speak not without reason
> or proves.
I still don't have the facts of the matter. Lots of people saying the
same thing doesn't establish a fact.