[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de> writes:

> The choice is to either restrict the required client-side fanciness to
> what most of our mirrors are willing to accept, or go without mirrors 
> (OK, OK ... fewer mirrors anyway), which is something I don't think we'd
> want.

The whole point of SCC was to go without mirrors.

Reply to: