Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Mar 26, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
>
> > Actually, while there was lots of discussion, there wasn't actually a
> > proposal explaining what the reduced level of freedom would be and why
> > firmware needs less freedom.
> I explained this multiple times and I believe that I was not the only
> one doing so, so I wonder if you are a bit selective in what you
> remember.
You kept saying nothing more than "we don't care about modifying them
because nobody will ever want to", which is, well, simply false.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: Humberto Massa <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: "Bernhard R. Link" <brlink@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: Raphael Hertzog <raphael@ouaza.com>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: "Bernhard R. Link" <brlink@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)