debian-legal Dec 2003 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Frank Küster

• Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2 (II) Dec 05
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Another proposed renaming for Debian/NetBSD Dec 18
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Requirements for non-free? Dec 04
• Re: Status of new LPPL version? Dec 14
• Status of new LPPL version? Dec 12
• Re: Bug#223819: RFA: murasaki -- another HotPlug Agent Dec 13
• Re: Requirements for non-free? Dec 05

Jörgen Hägg

• popular swirl... Dec 30

Måns Rullgård

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 15
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 05
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Source only opensource licence. Dec 02
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06

Aaron M. Ucko

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17

Adrian Bunk

• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 20
• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 15
• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 16

Alexander Cherepanov

• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 14
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 24
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 09
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 04
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 24
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 04
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 08
• Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2 (II) Dec 02
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 24
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 07
• Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2 (II) Dec 02
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 24
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 14
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 04
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 04

Andreas Metzler

• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 16

Andrew Suffield

• Re: popular swirl... Dec 31
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18
• Re: how (not) to write copyright files Dec 14
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 18
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 18
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Call to Power 2 license Dec 28
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09

Anthony DeRobertis

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: I'll contact upstream Dec 23
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 16
• Re: Bug#223819: RFA: murasaki -- another HotPlug Agent Dec 16
• Re: jabber-yahoo copyright file Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 16
• [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 16
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 14
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 16
• Re: Source only opensource licence. Dec 07
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 14
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 17
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 15
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 17
• Re: Source only opensource licence. Dec 03
• I'll contact upstream Dec 23

Arnoud Engelfriet

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 17
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: fat filesystem in debian package Dec 04

Ben Reser

• Re: popular swirl... Dec 30
• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 17
• Re: popular swirl... Dec 30

Benj. Mako Hill

• Re: popular swirl... Dec 31

Branden Robinson

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 19
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 14
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• [OT] Re: Bug#224866: kanjidic: Kanjidic is not DFSG-free Dec 31
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 30
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 29
• Re: Status of new LPPL version? Dec 13
• Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2 (II) Dec 04
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 13
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 19
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 13
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2 (II) Dec 04

Brian M. Carlson

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18
• Re: how (not) to write copyright files Dec 14
• Re: jabber-yahoo copyright file Dec 16
• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 15

Brian T. Sniffen

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 24
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 30
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Source only opensource licence. Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 15
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: popular swirl... Dec 30
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 14
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09

Brian T.Sniffen

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10

Brian Thomas Sniffen

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 16

Cameron Patrick

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08

Christoph Berg

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15

D. Starner

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10

Dafydd Harries

• Bug#224866: kanjidic: Kanjidic is not DFSG-free Dec 23

Daniel Burrows

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15

Danilo Piazzalunga

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18

David Weinehall

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15

Don Armstrong

• Re: Bug#224866: kanjidic: Kanjidic is not DFSG-free Dec 23
• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 24
• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 31
• Re: Source only opensource licence. Dec 02
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2 (II) Dec 02
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 01
• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 29
• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 24
• Re: Bug#224866: kanjidic: Kanjidic is not DFSG-free Dec 23
• Re: Bug#224866: kanjidic: Kanjidic is not DFSG-free Dec 23

Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

• Re: Bug#224866: kanjidic: Kanjidic is not DFSG-free Dec 23
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 12
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17

Florian Weimer

• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 24
• Re: I'll contact upstream Dec 23
• Re: I'll contact upstream Dec 23

Franck

• Source only opensource licence. Dec 01

Frederic Ollivier

• Do a Slis .deb package Dec 05

Glenn Maynard

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 16
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 11

Graham Wilson

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15

Henning Makholm

• Re: Do a Slis .deb package Dec 05
• Re: Bug#223819: RFA: murasaki -- another HotPlug Agent Dec 13
• Re: Bug#223819: RFA: murasaki -- another HotPlug Agent Dec 16
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Do a Slis .deb package Dec 05
• Re: legal archeology : ocaml bignum is non-free, is the licence enough to go into non-free ? Dec 16
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 07
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 01
• Re: Source only opensource licence. Dec 02
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 10
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 08
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 13

Jakob Bohm

• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 29
• Re: OT: Database protection and why European law is different Dec 29

Jaldhar H. Vyas

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15

Jamin W. Collins

• Re: jabber-yahoo copyright file Dec 16
• jabber-yahoo copyright file Dec 16

Jean Darcoux

• fat filesystem in debian package Dec 04
• fat filesystem in debian package Dec 04

Jeremy Hankins

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 16
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 17
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 17
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09

Jimmy Kaplowitz

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18

Joachim Breitner

• Re: popular swirl... Dec 30

Joe Moore

• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 19
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 16

Joel Baker

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 14
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 12
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 16
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 14
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 14
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15

Josselin Mouette

• Re: Source only opensource licence. Dec 02

Kai Henningsen

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18

Karl Chen

• Re: BOINC packaging Jan 01

Lionel Elie Mamane

• SRFI copyright license Dec 24
• Re: SRFI copyright license Dec 24

Ludovic Drolez

• Re: Bug#224866: kanjidic: Kanjidic is not DFSG-free Dec 23

Mark Brown

• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 17

Matthew Palmer

• Re: popular swirl... Dec 30

Michael Adams

• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 16
• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 17

Mike Dresser

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17

Mike Hommey

• Re: pvpgn ITP Dec 29

MJ Ray

• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 16
• Re: Bug#221761: elfutils: licence seems not DFSG-free, was: "Open Software License" and patent/reciprocity issues (fwd) Dec 08
• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 17

Momchil Velikov

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18

Nathan Hawkins

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 14

Nathanael Nerode

• Another proposed renaming for Debian/NetBSD Dec 18
• Since you designed the Debian 'swirl' logo... Dec 31
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 31
• Re: Re: popular swirl... Dec 31
• Re: Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 18
• Just change the note. Dec 18

Peter Palfrader

• how (not) to write copyright files Dec 14
• Re: how (not) to write copyright files Dec 15

Robert Millan

• pvpgn ITP Dec 28
• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 17
• Re: pvpgn ITP Dec 29

Roger Leigh

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 16

Roland Mas

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07

Roland Stigge

• Re: how (not) to write copyright files Dec 15

Russell Coker

• Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s) Dec 15

Ryan Underwood

• Call to Power 2 license Dec 28

Santiago Vila

• Re: Source only opensource licence. Dec 07

Scott James Remnant

• Re: how (not) to write copyright files Dec 15
• Re: popular swirl... Dec 31
• Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 09

Sergey Spiridonov

• Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy Dec 16

Simon Law

• Re: I'll contact upstream Dec 23

Steve Langasek

• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: [vorlon@netexpress.net: Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux]] Dec 17
• Re: fat filesystem in debian package Dec 04
• Re: Requirements for non-free? Dec 04
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 08
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 07
• Re: fat filesystem in debian package Dec 04

Sven Luther

• legal archeology : ocaml bignum is non-free, is the licence enough to go into non-free ? Dec 16
• Re: legal archeology : ocaml bignum is non-free, is the licence enough to go into non-free ? Dec 16

Thomas Viehmann

• Re: how (not) to write copyright files Dec 15

Toni Mueller

• Re: popular swirl... Dec 31

Walter Landry

• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 15
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 09
• Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian Dec 06
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 24
• Re: Requirements for non-free? Dec 05
• Re: Binaries under GPL(2) Dec 05

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]