Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> Ah, found it -- Debian KDE list, late July 2002: Konqueror doesn't
> link against OpenSSL. It runs a separate process (kcm_crypto, it
> looks like), which links against openssl... but does so in a way that
> *doesn't* invoke OpenSSL's advertising clause. Thus, the GPL
> prohibition on additional restrictions isn't invoked, and what KDE's
> doing is fine.
I don't quite follow. It doesn't matter if extra restrictions are
invoked or not; they're GPL-incompatible regardless. ("Don't use this
software to make bombs" is GPL-incompatible, even if you don't happen to
be using it to make bombs.)
Could you link to the thread you're referencing?
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)