On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:09:37PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > does anybody know what is going to happen with regard to LPPL-1.3, and > in which timeline? The latest mails I found were > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200306/msg00206.html > (a new draft) > > and two analyses by Branden Robinson, with one follow-up by Frank > Mittelbach. > > I would be glad to be pointed to some place where I can find further > information on that. The actual reason why I looked for it is that I am > thinking of incorporating some code from a GPL'ed LaTeX add-on package > into mine, but do not want to license mine under GPL, but rather under a > DFSG-free LPPL. I guess it will be much easier to convince the author to > re-license his package if I can tell him that LPPL is also DFSG-free. As far as I know, the new license hasn't actually been attached to anything yet. You'd probably need to contact Frank Mittelbach for a status update. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Extra territorium jus dicenti branden@debian.org | impune non paretur. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature