Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> writes:
> Scripsit mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
>
>> I know that is how law works. I just find it strange, that the GPL is
>> so explicit on this point, and yet doesn't bother to clarify at all
>> what a "derived work" might be, just to take an example.
>
> It's on purpose: The GPL wants as much as possible to be derived
> works.
Of the FSF wants it that way. The problem is that they consider it
immoral if a commercial company uses similar reasoning.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: "D. Starner" <shalesller@writeme.com>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Arnoud Engelfriet <galactus@stack.nl>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>