Re: Binaries under GPL(2)
Scripsit Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan@mccme.ru>
> If Section 2 allows someone (not copyright holder) to distribute a
> binary, there are only two alternatives IMHO: either
> 1. Section 2 doesn't require source form of anything distributable;
That is correct, it doesn't. But the only thing that *is*
distributable under #2 is whatever the author explicitly declares to
be "the Program". Usually that whatever happens to be source.
--
Henning Makholm "Hører I. Kald dem sammen. Så mange som overhovedet
muligt. Jeg siger jer det her er ikke bare stort. Det er
Stortstortstort. Det er allerhelvedes stort. Det er historiEN."
Reply to: