Re: [POSITION SUMMARY] Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian

[Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>]

On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 17:22, Andrew Suffield wrote:

> Actually, it's closer than you think. Any "product" [arbitrary
> definition] that requires all three components is a derivative work of
> all of them; that will almost certainly violate one or more of the
> licenses.

It may be; it may not be. Not even the FSF contents that a shell script
which requires bash is a derivative work of bash; a perl script of perl;
etc.

That's why its a discussion for another thread :-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part