Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org> writes:
> Måns Rullgård <mru@kth.se>:
>
>> I know that is how law works. I just find it strange, that the GPL is
>> so explicit on this point, and yet doesn't bother to clarify at all
>> what a "derived work" might be, just to take an example.
>
> I suppose the idea is to have the GPL apply as broadly as possible.
> Anyone who wants a clarification of "derived work" that is valid for
> their position in the space-time continuum should visit a law library.
The problem is that all such definitions are based on the notion that
a "work" is either something tangible, or a performance act. They
simply don't apply well to computer programs.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: "D. Starner" <shalesller@writeme.com>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Arnoud Engelfriet <galactus@stack.nl>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
- Re: Plugins, libraries, licenses and Debian
- From: Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org>