16-Dec-03 16:07 Joe Moore wrote: > Anthony DeRobertis said: >> The only time I think they would allow otherwise would be if the >> copyright holder distributed object code under the GPL. I don't know >> what they'd do then. > I'd argue (not that a court would necessarily agree) that "The Work" > described in sections 1 and 2 is the object code, so I can make and/or > distribute copies of The Work. Then it's Ok for non-free? Sasha