Re: Binaries under GPL(2)
- To: Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>
- Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Binaries under GPL(2)
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Date: 01 Dec 2003 09:06:19 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 871xrouctw.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net>
- In-reply-to: <20031201022144.GU13199@donarmstrong.com>
- References: <2.07b5.1HO1.HOXONC@cherepan.mccme.ru.msgid> <2.07b5.XZQJ.HOZPKB@cherepan.mccme.ru.msgid> <20031127040141.GL13199@donarmstrong.com> <87vfp6yz3k.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031129230006.GN13199@donarmstrong.com> <87k75igjhi.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031201003754.GS13199@donarmstrong.com> <87brqt5pp4.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031201011254.GT13199@donarmstrong.com> <877k1h1eye.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031201022144.GU13199@donarmstrong.com>
Scripsit Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > That's pretty prominent, I think. Especially as strings(1) is the
> > canonical way of looking for notices in an object file.
> Sure, but that's a case where you have acess to the assembly and can
> modify the resultant binary to include such a message.
No, I did not use any kind of source for the module in question. I
wrote a 2-line .s file myself and handled the existing .o opaquely.
--
Henning Makholm "De kan rejse hid og did i verden nok så flot
Og er helt fortrolig med alverdens militær"
Reply to: