On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:10:05AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Now, there is a potential problem. Remember that scripting language > mentioned before? If someone were to write a script that used both > INVERT and STENOG, and then distribute that script, there might be a > problem. But that's an issue for another thread. Actually, it's closer than you think. Any "product" [arbitrary definition] that requires all three components is a derivative work of all of them; that will almost certainly violate one or more of the licenses. Hmm, that's actually interesting. We have an emergent licensing constraint that is a property of none of the works involved, but only appears when they are put together. I don't think we can even discuss the DFSG-freeness of such a constraint in any meaningful way. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature