debian-legal Jun 2001 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 1 >
[next page] 		[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Re: Bug#101318: so what's wrong with freedos exactly? Re: Combining proprietary code and GPL for in-house use copyright lines in debian-specific package files extraneous issues facultative linking and libraries. ... FreeDOS and GPL-compatibility GPL's OS Exception (was Re: OpenSSL and GPLed programs) Re: gtkpool licensing Interesting Microsoft license clause re open source ITP with caution: libdvdcss libfpx licensing Re: license question and problems Re: Microcode license [#3] okay for non-free? OpenSSL and GPLed programs PacWars2 library use Python is now GPL-compatible again! Q: Combining proprietary code and GPL for in-house use Question about the old BSD license and GPL (gtkipmsg) Some Legal Analysis of Combining propriety code GPL etc. Toba license: free/GPL compatible? Tshirt design legal issues tshirt design url The last update was on 12:39 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 278 messages. Page 1 of 1.
<<
[previous month] 		|<
[first page] 		<
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 1
 >
[next page] 		>|
[last page] 		>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc