On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:44:04PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > It's not necessarily unreasonable, but it's something that is > quite different from simply letting your code keep *its* freedom. The only freedom that's lacking is the freedom to become nonfree. > Which was all I said. Blatently false. However, I'll clip out the rest of what you said from this message. -- Raul