Re: Combining proprietary code and GPL for in-house use

[Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>]

Scripsit Raul Miller
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:44:04PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:

> > It's not necessarily unreasonable, but it's something that is
> > quite different from simply letting your code keep *its* freedom.

> The only freedom that's lacking is the freedom to become nonfree.

False. A freedom which is also lacking is the freedom to combine
with code under other licenses, without making the GPLed code itself
nonfree. Cf the subject line...

-- 
Henning Makholm                                 "Need facts -- *first*. Then
                                            the dialysis -- the *analysis*."