[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Combining proprietary code and GPL for in-house use



On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 06:56:50PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> "none" <chloehoffman@hotmail.com> writes:
> > "2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it,
> > thus forming a work based on the Program"
> The proper interpretation of this area of the GPL is not on topic for
> this mailing list.
> Please take the discussion to somewhere where it belongs.

Uh, you just posted half a dozen messages on roughly this topic to this
list, why is it suddenly off-topic when someone else does?

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgphvfWz4nJsc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: