Re: facultative linking and libraries. ...
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:29:35PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> The real problem is that it is a pain for the user to use a toplevel
> interpreter without propper input history support. The authors couldn't care
> less, and don't want (yet) to release the few files from the toplevel
> interpreter uinder the gpl. But this again may change later, especially if
> they loose some of the ideological fears they may have on the GPL.
>
Why not use libeditline instead? It's source-code compatible with the basic
features of readline and has a BSD (sans ad clause) type license.
--
Brian Ristuccia
brian@ristuccia.com
bristucc@cs.uml.edu
Reply to: