On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:16:46AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > If not, then presumably I've done exactly the same things to satisfy > > 2(a) when I run some non-free program with a GPLed library, or > > vice-versa. > These are not necessarily exactly the same. Sure they are. I write two programs, A and B, and give them to a friend. A is licensed under the GPL, B is under a special "For my friend" license. He runs them. I then license B to him under the GPL. I do this by just sending him an email, I don't bother recompiling the program or anything. He runs them again. Either he satisfied any "prominent notification" and "modification time" clauses both times or neither. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpaU3wjuzu5D.pgp
Description: PGP signature