Re: okay for non-free?
It looks like you're dealing with a source-only package in non-free like
qmail or pine, unless you have an explicit blessing from the author that
he meant "distribute in binary form" as a use. Contrib's out, though,
since contrib needs to be DFSG free and dependent on something not in
Debian (which includes something in non-free).
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>Hi,
>
>could anyone comment the attached license? Is it suitable for non-free,
>or even contrib?
>
>-- UNACE-SOURCE v1.2b (extract-util) --
>the source may be distributed and used,
>but I,Marcel Lemke, retain ownership of
>the copyrights to the source.
>---------------------------------------
>WWW:
> http://members.aol.com/mlemke6413/ace
>EMAIL:
> mlemke6413@aol.com
>---------------------------------------
>
>Gr{us,eeting}s,
>Eduard.
>
--
There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with suitable
application of High Explosives.
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!
Reply to: